tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6588247216777605704.post5519784760515455641..comments2023-04-05T08:04:07.514-04:00Comments on Bryn Mawr Classical Review: 2011.07.12Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6588247216777605704.post-41242867774165736492011-10-17T08:43:45.593-04:002011-10-17T08:43:45.593-04:00If the reviewer says "this is an inherently G...If the reviewer says "this is an inherently German book, (...) conservative, (...) and ultimately negative", this clearly is an inherently chauvinistic remark, and certainly falls short of the standards to be expected from Bryn Mawr!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6588247216777605704.post-14135482712870266852011-08-07T08:45:12.025-04:002011-08-07T08:45:12.025-04:00As a bystander, I would comment herein,"How c...As a bystander, I would comment herein,"How could one know if these things were true."...<br />"Where you there? was anyone 'there'?" The whole thing by the author and Kennell is pure scepticism and, her time would be better spent on non academia subjects as she tends to not enjoy anything in life from her continual caustic stance regarding any author's work. (except her own self-authored 'mess of pottage"<br />It is indeed a possibility the whole thing was just a myth. All other points of view are just conjecture. One could sum all this up and her analogy of this book and the work of the author and be 100% correct by saying..."Who really cares?"Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com