tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6588247216777605704.post445703731179567815..comments2023-04-05T08:04:07.514-04:00Comments on Bryn Mawr Classical Review: 2011.03.48Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6588247216777605704.post-51863710762909844702011-03-22T08:00:17.471-04:002011-03-22T08:00:17.471-04:00I don't know if it's done to post comments...I don't know if it's done to post comments on one's own review. But C. P. Jones kindly points out the following complements on the "Partherdenkmal": W. Seipel,ed., Das Partherdenkmal von Ephesos: Akten des Kolloquiums Wien, 27.-28. April 2003 (Vienna, 2006); M. Fuchs, ³Ein panegyrisches Denkmal --- oder: zur Historizität des Parthermonuments von Ephesos," Jahrbuch des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts 124 (2009), 347-378,<br />(prefers the date under Marcus).John Manoreply@blogger.com